Poetry--Bishop, Williams
We are now beginning our
study of poetry.
You may also add your own
voice, by either posting a blog of your own, or choosing a blog from one of
your fellow bloggers (list to left; more names will appear as blog URLs are
submitted) and adding your two cents (or two bucks--adjusted for inflation--)
Remember: if you are writing a blog, post only
blog comments on the blogs
* * * *
Bishop and Williams:
Be sure to review the study sheet for
Bishop and Williams, posted to Blackboard, for insights into the
themes/concerns of poems for both poets. The quotes on the study sheets are
excerpted from articles on MAP and LRC (see course syllabus); search for the
complete articles in these databases.
Look over the exercises on
Blackboard, as well, which can provide additional guidance and practice in
literary analysis.
Katie Ford's essay on Bishop, "Visibility
Is Poor..." (Poets.org), is also insightful (esp pars. 4, beginning
"According to Bishop..." through 8, beginning "Bishop's
challenge...), esp. regarding the self-questioning tendency of much
of her imagery and its "challenge to... fixity" (see par 8,
esp. Michael Sells distinction between "apophatic" and
kataphatic" imagery); several image modulations in "The Fish"
demonstrate a lack of "fixity." To find the essay, on poest.org
[official site], enter her name in the search field, click the search icon,
"then scroll down to find Katie Ford's then click
on the title.
For Williams, but for image-based poetry in
general including several of the poets we will read this semester: urthona.com,
as noted on the Williams study sheet in assignments; read the essays on the
“Red Wheelbarrow” and on free verse—“The Nymphs Departed”
Again, for all poets we read this semester,
always review my opening blog comments, as well as my comments on current
and previous blogs before writing esays; the combination of blogs, study
sheets, exercises and critical articles will provide an analytical framework
for your journals.
Ready? Good blogging...or at least,
reading....
A few random comments on Bishop's "The
Fish" which can be (fish) food for thought:
The eiphany of interdependence is one aspect of
the "victory" the speaker suggests; i.e., the collapse of
subject/object, as the speaker projects elements of her past and her own
experience onto it, while at the same time realizing the object's essential
otherness; killing tthe fish would also be killing that "part of herself"
she found in it (and perhaps was revalidated by it)? It has become part of her
world, if not the other way round... the fish is about a relationship with
the "other," if not a human other.
you all may also want to take a look at Bishop's
"At the Fishouses," in Poets.org: the imagery in that poem will
seem even more errant than in "The Fish"--is it? or, if it is, why is
it?
Comments
Post a Comment