Chopin--To Begin (or End--How?)
Welcome to the Eng 40 class blog. As student blogs begin to appear--on the right hand side of the screen--you should select a different one each week, and read and respond to what the writer has to say. You must comment on at least one other student's blog, a different writer each week, to receive full credit for the blogs.
Find your blogs posted under "Current Blogs." To access a blog, read
and comment on it, simply click on the blogger's name. Review all
current blogs about a particular story, including my comments, and others'
comments, before writing essays about that story.
NOTE: If, after clicking on a blog, you get a lot of code but no blog, check
the URL in the top address bar: if it ends with
"/feeds/posts/default," delete all of that so that the address ends
with ".com"--do not delete the entire address, just the last three
parts; then press "enter" and you will see the blog.
NOTE: to avoid above, if you are creating a blog, on your blog
"design" page, under "settings" check
"other," and make sure you select "full" on the
"feeds" drop-down menu.
Also, under "settings," "posts, comments and sharing," make
sure to select "anyone" under "comments"
I've also saved blogs from previous classes (see "blogs from previous
classes")--please review these, so you can see the strengths and
weaknesses (and avoid the latter); You may, in your blogs, refer to comments
made by bloggers in previous classes, but you must also refer to the
current blogs. Two good examples are in 9th set of "Blogs from
Previous classes": the one titled "Short Fiction at KBCC" is the
most insightful overall; the second "English 40" (often referred to
in my comments as "Albert's blog")--second from bottom of the list--
is also a good one, though many have insights Links scattered through; the
fourth and fifth from the bottom ("my thoughts" and "short
fiction eng") are the weakest; but attend to my comments on ALL the
blogs. Please DO NOT leave comment for or send messages to
previous bloggers.
I'm looking forward to hearing all your great ideas! I hope you'll enjoy this
virtual class experience, and take full advantage of this opportunity to become
Internet authors.
VERY IMPORTANT: In addition to my comments on individual blogs, read my
weekly blog posts on each story before writing about that story--they will give
you some guidance, clarification, things to think about, etc... And
remember--blogs are not just summaries. Give us your best insights!
To reemphasize: when blogging about these stories, concentrate on
specific commentary. No need
to summarize the complete piece each time--we all know that already, and your
essays will provide an introductory overview. You can begin with a summary if
that helps you focus your thoughts, but don't END with that: just as in writing
your essays, pick an interesting event, detail, image, symbol, bit of dialogue,
element of setting, scene, etc. that plugs into some interesting thematic
issues, character conflicts, etc., and run with it. The essays
will--SHOULD--provide detailed analysis of how these things function in the
story itself; we can do some of this here, as well--the blogs can help you find
points of discussion to analyze further in essays--but we also have an
opportunity here, to kick some of our discoveries around in a larger field,
and, via the comments on others' blogs, some opportunities to build on,
counterpoint or argue with, or provide additional/differing perspectives on,
each other's findings..
Note: in general, plan on reading stories more than once--you should read,
reread as you go along (why is discussed below), then do a second complete
reread before writing.
NOTE: In general, look for conflict and change in stories. Usually, in a short story,
this resides with one character, the main or point-of-view character (though
may also occur in secondary characters to some extent). Conflicts can be
both within a character and between characters (usually a bit of both). Note
how details reveal what these conflicts are, how they develop (how characters
work through them), and evidence, sometimes subtle, that a character changes
during the story as a consequence, and achieves--though not always--some
sort of realization/resolution of conflict.
NOTE: In general, it is good
practice to read a story through once, noting details that
seem important or interesting, even though you may not know why at first.
Then, as patterns begin to emerge, you can go back
("reread") to see how details of these patterns accumulate and
lead to meaning. These activities will also help you gather
evidence that you can use in developing your essays. A second read of
the story, with some of these patterns in mind, should help you formulate
specific thematic foci.
Your notes on these two activities, + the study sheet on Bb, should give you
ample material to begin drafting your analytical essay. The main
point of the essay is detailed analysis--find patterns of particular details
that suggest what is going on--character conflict and change--beneath the
literal surface plot.
Now to the first story: Kate Chopin's "Story of an Hour":
The study sheet posted to Blackboard (Bb), under "assignments,"
excerpts comments from several secondary sources; reviewing these critics'
remarks should provide a critical context and help you with the theme of the
story, as well as providing some background for the analysis of particular
details (titles and authors of articles are in bold, followed be excerpts from
the articles).
Another very helpful set of materials is found by following
the links to the story itself on the syllabus. Choose the link on
the syllabus for Chopin's story (http://www.vcu.edu/engweb/webtexts/hour/).
After reading the story, try the "Reading response" exercise, then
select the "Now Go to the Study Text" link and read the annotations
to the highlighted textual details (mouseover a highlight and click on it to
get the popup window message)--these will help you see how a close reading of a
story's details reveal its themes and patterns of meaning, and how meaning is
articulated throughout the story as these patterns of details
develop/interconnect/accumulate. You should annotate stories in this way
as your read--for eg, keep a Word window open as you read, so that you
can make note of relevant scenes and details.
In this, and many of our stories, we have a focused third person
narrator--i.e., the narrative voice is not a character in the story, as in
first person narration, but focused primarily through the eyes of the main
character, so Mrs. Mallard is the character we really come to understand--she
is a "round," fully developed character (ie, we see her conflict and
how she works through it) rather than a "flat" character; the purpose
of flat characters is typically to bring out aspects of the main
character.
In this
case, attend esp to Mrs. Mallard's observations, and the emphasis (her
unconscious focus on, until realization comes to her) patterns of open v closed
(this patterns is evident in at least four separate images throughout the
story, beginning with the "open window"--i.e, to get the pattern
stated, consider what surrounds the window (it is a window in
what?). Also note details of Mrs.Mallard's observations--what she sees
through the open window.
As you comment specifically on patterns of imagery and details of those images,
consider the closing description of Mr. Mallard--what is he carrying, and how
do the particular details (how is his brief case described? what else is he
holding?) resonate with main character's conflict?
Avoid too general a reading--Mrs. Mallard is not "happy" about her
husband's death: the focus is not on his death, but on the door this opens for
her
Avoid also leaping to her articulated self-realization "free free
free..."; the essay should focus on how the character gets to that moment
of realization--details of her observation, showing the gradual understanding
of her new position, and the conflict/struggle in accepting it. Notice
how patterns of details reveal this struggle and the gradualness of the
realization; particular details and images that speak to her before she
consciously grasps their messages...
Teaser question: what word rhymes with "room" (and what does that say
about what a room might symbolize in this context) that, if explored
though relationship to other details in the story, comments on Mrs. Mallard's
status/position in her marriage--and the position of women generally at the
turn of the 19th century.
Good luck, and I'm excited to have all your voices as part of our reading
experience....
OK--good blogging; be sure to check here for any current messages/updates.
Also, please check Blackboard, as well as your email, for
important information throughout the semester.
The word that rhymes with room is gloom, “a state of depression or despondency.” Louise
ReplyDeleteMallard would clearly be in a state of depression and despondency and women in general at that
time had cause to be despondent. Additionally, it was a depressing time for persons of African
decent living in the South, as slavery still existed, as is evident because Kate Chopin’s family The
O’Flaherty also owned slaves. Another word that comes to mind with room is a prison, because
Louise Mallard was trapped in a matrimonial prison, as a wife and in a socially constructed
female prison, that all women are born into by virtue of their gender
Dimock Wai-chee writes in (“Kate Chopin.” Modern American Women Writers.)
“In spite of these efforts, however, gender inequality remained a glaring fact at the turn of the
century. In New Orleans, for instance, the Napoleonic Code still formed the basis for the marriage contract. The wife and all her "accumulations" after marriage were the property of her husband, and she was legally bound to live with him and to follow him wherever he chose to go. As stipulated by Article 1591 of the laws of Louisiana, four groups of people were deemed "absolutely incapable of being witness to testaments": children not yet sixteen; persons who were insane, deaf, dumb, or blind; criminals; and "women of any age soever."
In essence women were glorified slaves, as they had no agency , not only over themselves but
over their wealth.